notitur.com October 3, 2026
Revenue & Distribution1 min read

Technology doesn't kill middlemen in travel, it replaces them

JSBy Joan SanzCurated by Joan Sanz. · October 3, 2026 · Follow on LinkedIn
Voice reading · ~2 min

The promise was simple: technology would arrive and middlemen would vanish. In travel, what's actually happening is something else. Each new layer doesn't kill the one before, it swaps it for another sitting in the same spot. The Travel Tech Essentialist makes this case in issue 210 and it's one of the most honest takes in the sector right now.

The classic example is the hub. A smaller plane can skip the connection and fly point to point, sure. But someone still runs that flight, sells the seat and carries the risk. Same with the AI agent that promises to bypass the OTA: the moment it actually books, someone has to answer when the flight is cancelled at 3am. My read is that the middleman doesn't disappear, he relocates. And in that relocation there's business for whoever understands his real function: cutting friction or absorbing risk.

For a hotel, the operational question isn't how to kill the OTA. It's how much of your inventory and guest attention ends up in the new layer and how much you keep. I see a clear opening here for anyone with owned data and fast response capacity. The layer changes, the commission stays, and the revenue manager's job is deciding who charges it and why.

Quick questions

Will AI actually kill OTAs in travel?
Not with today's logic. AI changes who brokers the booking, but someone still has to handle payment, cancellations and claims. What changes is who gets paid for that function and how much.
Why doesn't technology eliminate travel intermediaries?
Because the middleman does two real jobs: cutting friction for the buyer and absorbing risk for the seller. As long as those jobs exist, someone gets paid to do them, whether that's a human or an algorithm.
What does this mean for a small independent hotel?
It means losing ground to direct distribution if you don't control data and fast response. The practical route is deciding which channel is worth it and defending margin on the rest, not trying to compete everywhere at once.
Do point-to-point flights end hubs?
Not really. A smaller plane can skip the connection, but the low-cost model and airline agreements keep the concentration logic alive. What changes is which routes work without a big airport.
What question should a revenue manager be asking?
Who carries the risk and who charges for the transaction in each channel. If you can't answer that with data, you're giving away margin without knowing it.

Was this article useful?

Enjoyed this? Share Notitur

X LinkedIn WhatsApp

The daily brief

Notitur in your inbox

One sharp travel-industry brief a day. Free.

Editorial content by Notitur. It may contain errors. Verify anything important with the original source.

This article may mention third-party products, companies or services for informational purposes. Notitur does not endorse them and is not responsible for them or for what they offer. Editorial content curated by the Notitur team.

Produced with AI assistance and editorial review.

← Back to Notitur

Notitur is an independent digest. It is not the official site of any brand mentioned. Content is editorial and produced with AI assistance and editorial review, and may contain errors. Verify anything important with the original source. This is not financial, legal or investment advice. Some links or blocks may be sponsored or affiliate. Trademarks belong to their owners. You can unsubscribe at any time with one click, and you can request access or deletion of your data at notitur.com/contact.

⚙ Admin