Supercity brought investors into its PMS decision
Supercity Aparthotels took six months to decide which PMS to run. Managing director Philip Houghton explains in a piece published by eHotelier that something unusual weighed on the process: the view of its institutional lenders. In other words, the people putting up the money had a say on the tool managing inventory, bookings and rates.
That is the real story here. The detail signals a shift I keep seeing across apartments and serviced living: whoever finances the operation now looks at the tech stack the way they look at the building itself. If the system cannot produce reliable reporting or scale a portfolio, the risk shows up in the investment committee.
One uncomfortable nuance, tech due diligence stopped being a formality. An aparthotel operator raising capital with a messy stack will feel it in the negotiation. In my view that is good news for the sector, because it forces software purchases to be judged on operational and financial logic rather than on a feature sheet.
The practical takeaway for any mid-sized group: if your PMS cannot survive an investor's question, the problem is not the software.
Quick questions
What did Supercity Aparthotels do with its PMS?
Why would an aparthotel group consult its investors?
How long does picking a PMS usually take in hospitality?
What does this mean for smaller apartment operators?
Is it good that investors weigh in on the PMS?
Was this article useful?
The daily brief
Notitur in your inbox
One sharp travel-industry brief a day. Free.
Editorial content by Notitur. It may contain errors. Verify anything important with the original source.
This article may mention third-party products, companies or services for informational purposes. Notitur does not endorse them and is not responsible for them or for what they offer. Editorial content curated by the Notitur team.