notitur.com September 14, 2026
Artificial Intelligence1 min read

Steve Case warns: some travel friction should not be automated

JSBy Joan SanzCurated by Joan Sanz. · September 14, 2026 · Follow on LinkedIn
Voice reading · ~2 min

Steve Case has long applied one question to every investment he looks at, and now he is bringing it to the travel business. As Skift reports, the Revolution founder will take to the Skift Global Forum with an idea that is simple to state and hard to execute: separate what AI will make abundant from what will remain scarce. His thesis is that capital and attention should go to the scarce part, and that a chunk of the industry's job now is spotting which travel friction is worth keeping.

Translated into our business, that question becomes concrete product decisions. Charging for a phone call has no defence, and neither does forcing someone through a seven step form to change a date. But some friction does build value, and that is where teams should slow down the automation plan:

My reading, and I say this as opinion, is that the decision is made far less in the chat window and far more in internal data. If your inventory, rates and customer history are messy, AI does not remove a bad experience, it hides it under a faster layer. What stays scarce in that case is clean information.

Quick questions

What does Steve Case propose for AI in the travel industry?
According to Skift, Case applies one question to every investment: what becomes abundant and what stays scarce. In travel, that leads him to argue the industry should protect the friction that adds real value for the customer.
Which traveller frictions should not be automated?
Human support on sensitive claims, the advisor who reshapes a route in real time or the sales rep who understands a corporate account. These are points where contact with the customer builds trust, not just cost.
What questions does the Skift Global Forum raise on AI and travel?
The forum puts on the table how AI splits what is abundant from what is scarce in the industry, and what product decisions hotels, airlines and OTAs make when they automate service or distribution processes.
What does a hotel gain by protecting certain friction?
It keeps human contact where it matters most, the complex claim or the consultative sale, and frees the team from repetitive tasks. The result tends to be a more coherent experience, not a slower one.
Is adding AI to the booking process enough to improve it?
No. Without clean inventory, rates and customer data, AI only speeds up a bad experience. Tidying internal data is the precondition for automation to deliver anything at all.

Was this article useful?

Enjoyed this? Share Notitur

X LinkedIn WhatsApp

The daily brief

Notitur in your inbox

One sharp travel-industry brief a day. Free.

Editorial content by Notitur. It may contain errors. Verify anything important with the original source.

This article may mention third-party products, companies or services for informational purposes. Notitur does not endorse them and is not responsible for them or for what they offer. Editorial content curated by the Notitur team.

Produced with AI assistance and editorial review.

← Back to Notitur

Notitur is an independent digest. It is not the official site of any brand mentioned. Content is editorial and produced with AI assistance and editorial review, and may contain errors. Verify anything important with the original source. This is not financial, legal or investment advice. Some links or blocks may be sponsored or affiliate. Trademarks belong to their owners. You can unsubscribe at any time with one click, and you can request access or deletion of your data at notitur.com/contact.

⚙ Admin