notitur.com October 3, 2026
OTAs1 min read

Dakota Smith leaves Hopper and its B2B arm loses its anchor

JSBy Joan SanzCurated by Joan Sanz. · October 3, 2026 · Follow on LinkedIn
Voice reading · ~2 min

Hopper is losing one of its most recognisable figures. Dakota Smith, co-founder of the company and head of its B2B division, has left the business, according to Skift. The source quoted by the outlet makes the sting clear: Smith had a lot of credibility in the B2B space, which happens to be Hopper's most important division.

That is no small thing. Hopper stopped being just that OTA playing with price prediction and fare freezes a while ago. It became a supplier selling that tech to airlines and agencies. The B2B arm is where the big, recurring contracts live, not direct consumer sales. Losing the person who led it and knew it from the inside raises an awkward question for the sector: how much of that edge rests on people and how much on the product?

My read is straightforward. In travel-tech, the fintech layer (fare financing, insurance, smart upsell) is now more profitable than pure distribution, and Hopper is ahead there. If the company consolidates that business with a new team, the message to airlines and agencies is that the tech outlasts any single name. For professionals buying these solutions, the door that opens is better negotiating ground: when a supplier loses its public face, it is a good time to revisit terms and look at alternatives. I would not write Hopper off, but I would watch its B2B roadmap closely over the next few quarters.

Quick questions

Who is Dakota Smith and what role did he hold at Hopper?
Dakota Smith was a co-founder of Hopper and ran its B2B division, the most important part of the company according to sources cited by Skift. His exit means losing a figure with strong credibility in that segment.
What is Hopper's B2B business?
It is the arm where Hopper sells its price prediction, fare freeze and fintech products to airlines and agencies. Unlike direct-to-traveller sales, this channel brings recurring contracts and higher margins.
Why does the exit of a B2B boss at an OTA matter?
Because in travel-tech, commercial relationships and product knowledge carry a lot of weight. If the business depends on the person rather than just the tech, an exit like this can slow deals with airlines and agencies.
What should airlines working with Hopper do?
Review their contracts and roadmap with the supplier, use the moment to negotiate better terms and assess alternatives. When a supplier changes its public face, it is a good time to rebalance the relationship.
Is B2B distribution more profitable than direct-to-traveller sales?
Generally yes, because airline and agency contracts are recurring and come with lower acquisition costs. That is why losing the head of that area at Hopper weighs more than a simple org chart change.

Was this article useful?

Enjoyed this? Share Notitur

X LinkedIn WhatsApp

The daily brief

Notitur in your inbox

One sharp travel-industry brief a day. Free.

Editorial content by Notitur. It may contain errors. Verify anything important with the original source.

This article may mention third-party products, companies or services for informational purposes. Notitur does not endorse them and is not responsible for them or for what they offer. Editorial content curated by the Notitur team.

Produced with AI assistance and editorial review.

← Back to Notitur

Notitur is an independent digest. It is not the official site of any brand mentioned. Content is editorial and produced with AI assistance and editorial review, and may contain errors. Verify anything important with the original source. This is not financial, legal or investment advice. Some links or blocks may be sponsored or affiliate. Trademarks belong to their owners. You can unsubscribe at any time with one click, and you can request access or deletion of your data at notitur.com/contact.

⚙ Admin