notitur.com September 19, 2026
Hotels1 min read

Riu says no to Paris and Amsterdam: the numbers didn't work

JSBy Joan SanzCurated by Joan Sanz. · September 19, 2026 · Follow on LinkedIn
Voice reading · ~1 min

Riu has turned down two cities any chain would sign for in a heartbeat. According to Preferente, the company received projects to open in Paris and Amsterdam, two major European capitals where it still has no presence, and dismissed them because they didn't fit its investment criteria. Naomi Riu, the group's chief financial officer, explained as much.

The reason isn't whim. Riu keeps a mostly holiday-led model with tightly defined return standards. An urban hotel in Paris or Amsterdam demands a different cost structure, a different revenue strategy and a different relationship with the owner. If the project doesn't fit that template, it doesn't fit. And the company would rather not force it.

Note the detail Naomi Riu drops in the same conversation: the chain does long for Barcelona, Rome or Amsterdam. The door isn't fully shut. What it rejected was the concrete project, not the city. My read is that Riu plays the long game and would rather wait for the asset that fits than sign one that forces it to rewrite the playbook.

Quick questions

Why did Riu refuse to open hotels in Paris and Amsterdam?
According to Naomi Riu, the projects didn't fit the company's investment criteria. Riu runs a very defined model and prefers not to force assets that don't match it.
Has Riu ruled out entering Paris or Amsterdam for good?
Not exactly. The CFO mentioned the chain longs for cities like Barcelona, Rome or Amsterdam. What was rejected was the specific project, not the city.
What criteria does Riu use to decide where to open a hotel?
The company remains mostly holiday-focused and scrutinises return on investment. If a project forces it to change its management model or owner relationship, it won't sign.
Does Riu lose market share by staying out of Paris or Amsterdam?
Not necessarily. Riu has a strong reputation in sun and beach, and its guests look for that. Being in urban capitals is a growth path, not an obligation for its current model.
What does this mean for the European hotel sector?
That not everyone rushes to sign urban assets out of pure FOMO. Some chains prioritise financial discipline and wait for the right opportunity. It's a sign of market maturity.

Was this article useful?

Enjoyed this? Share Notitur

X LinkedIn WhatsApp

The daily brief

Notitur in your inbox

One sharp travel-industry brief a day. Free.

Editorial content by Notitur. It may contain errors. Verify anything important with the original source.

This article may mention third-party products, companies or services for informational purposes. Notitur does not endorse them and is not responsible for them or for what they offer. Editorial content curated by the Notitur team.

Produced with AI assistance and editorial review.

← Back to Notitur

Notitur is an independent digest. It is not the official site of any brand mentioned. Content is editorial and produced with AI assistance and editorial review, and may contain errors. Verify anything important with the original source. This is not financial, legal or investment advice. Some links or blocks may be sponsored or affiliate. Trademarks belong to their owners. You can unsubscribe at any time with one click, and you can request access or deletion of your data at notitur.com/contact.

⚙ Admin