# Philippines scraps nearly 50-year travel tax and leaves TIE without funds

Canonical-URL: https://notitur.com/en/digest/philippines-travel-tax-repeal-tie-funds
Text-Version: https://notitur.com/en/digest/philippines-travel-tax-repeal-tie-funds.txt
Markdown-Version: https://notitur.com/en/digest/philippines-travel-tax-repeal-tie-funds.md
Language: en
Published: 2026-10-27T17:47:12.988Z
Modified: 2026-10-27T17:47:12.988Z
Author: Joan Sanz
Topics: Airlines
Summary: The Philippine Senate wants to abolish a half-century-old levy that funds tourism infrastructure before year-end. The 2027 budget brings no replacement and the sector is watching how spending holds up.

## Article

The Philippine Senate is still on track to scrap the tax on overseas travel that has been in place for nearly five decades before the end of the year. Senate president **Win Gatchalian** confirmed the roadmap in August. The problem is not the cheaper ticket for travellers, it is where the money comes from afterwards. That levy is the main revenue source for the agency that funds the country's tourism infrastructure, and the proposed **2027** budget includes no line to replace it, as [Skift](https://skift.com/2026/10/27/philippine-travel-tax-repeal-risks-tourism-funding-gap/) reports.

The picture is uncomfortable. Filipino travellers pay less to leave, true, and that can boost outbound demand towards destinations already taking share, with **Vietnam and Hong Kong** on the source's own list. But the agency that should use that push to improve airports, access and promotion is left without cash. With a hotel pipeline hanging on whether infrastructure arrives, the timing could hardly be trickier.

The reading for the sector cuts both ways. For airlines and OTAs selling the Philippines as a destination, one less fee cheapens the ticket and improves conversion, especially on long-haul and leisure routes. For hotels, the risk sits on the other side of the desk: fewer public funds for access, signage, international promotion and destination upkeep. A destination that stops investing in its front door ends up competing with one hand tied.

- **Winners in the short term:** outbound airlines, OTAs with Philippine inventory and the local traveller heading abroad.
- **Losers if no replacement lands:** the tourism infrastructure agency, secondary destinations that rely on public promotion and the hotel pipeline waiting on public works.
- **What to watch:** whether the Senate approves the abolition before December and whether the executive adds a substitute line in the 2027 budget.

The door that opens is clear: if the private sector pushes an alternative funding mechanism, from earmarked levies to public-private promotion funds, the destination can end up better off than with the old tax. What needs watching is the legislative calendar and the fine print of the budget. That is where it is decided whether the Philippines sells more tickets without ending up with no airport to show.

## Sources

- Skift: https://skift.com/2026/10/27/philippine-travel-tax-repeal-risks-tourism-funding-gap/

## Citation

Philippines scraps nearly 50-year travel tax and leaves TIE without funds. Notitur. 2026-10-27. https://notitur.com/en/digest/philippines-travel-tax-repeal-tie-funds